[JNC LIGHT NOVEL CONTEST 2025] Round 1 Judging for "Ongoing Series" Category Announced!
-
[JNC LIGHT NOVEL CONTEST 2025] Authors, check your emails! Round 1 Judging is complete for the "Ongoing Series" category! 🎉 Results for the "Complete Story" category will be revealed in a separate announcement soon!
Results: https://bit.ly/3Rr7xIa
-
Pinned by
hirei -
Referenced by
Rahul Balaggan
-
So many great titles
Congrats to everyone 👏 🎉
-
Congratulations to the other thirty one first round passers, and to everyone else, please look forward to reading The Perfect Princess Rejects Her Flatulence Powers in Another World if it passes the second round!
-
@hirei
Congratulations to all the 32 First round winners! I hope that whomever is round 2 and then to round 3 enjoys much success in the LN publishing business. -
I have no idea how many entries there were, but I'm almost certain there were a lot. So, whoever passed the first round can already be very proud. Congratulations to everyone!
-
awww man, I guess I wasn't lucky this time.
anyways though I didn't make past Round 1, my webnovel is still available for free (read to only those who are interested). It is available also on internet (maybe 3-4 sites total? Idk.)
just search "The Ability to Shift Anything is Convenient, Even in Another World!" on google
btw congrats to the winners! 🎊
-
Damn it sucks I didn't make it through, but I've learned a lot. I want to thank the staff of JNC and Kadokowa for giving me the opportunity to present my story to you guys. For everyone that made it through congratulations and good luck I'll be reading and supporting!
P.S. keep an eye for The Final Resting place for those of us who lost don't be discouraged. Keep writing there is always a next time! 😁
-
I don't see my novel on the list... I hate to be that guy, but this just makes me really depressed.
Is it possible to know why our novels didn't pass if we ask? I really want this series I wrote to get an anime adaptation, so if there's something I can do to improve the chances of that happening by improving the writing of my story, I'd really appreciate knowing what it is.
-
@AuthorMN said in [JNC LIGHT NOVEL CONTEST 2025] Round 1 Judging for "Ongoing Series" Category Announced!:
I don't see my novel on the list... I hate to be that guy, but this just makes me really depressed.
Is it possible to know why our novels didn't pass if we ask? I really want this series I wrote to get an anime adaptation, so if there's something I can do to improve the chances of that happening by improving the writing of my story, I'd really appreciate knowing what it is.
From what I saw last year, the best feedback for people who didn't make it past the first round came from people who shared samples and snippets of their entries on the JNC forums or on the JNC discord for other people to peruse and review. I know at least one author who took advantage of that style of community sharing and managed to get their entry past the first round this year.
The forum threads used for this last year were https://forums.j-novel.club/topic/7938/jnc-writing-group-feedback-thread and https://forums.j-novel.club/topic/7788/jnc-writing-support-group, I think offering to trade a review for a review might be the best way to go about it.
-
@Hylebos I actually did submit my ongoing entry there for feedback about a year ago. I got some feedback, but then the threads pretty much went dead. I don't have discord, so I couldn't access the server either. I did get feedback from friends and family on said entry though, and they all seemed to like the story and writing. There was also a unique premise, but I can only infer that the judges weren't impressed, which simply leads me to want to know why that was the case. Was there something in the writing? Was the outline not up to par, or was everything fine, but the story just not what the judges wanted? I really want this ongoing series I'm writing to become something big, thus, I want to get any and all feedback on it in order to increase the chances of it getting an anime adaptation.
-
@AuthorMN The judges made it clear they will not give feedback to those who don't pass round 1. Begging here won't do anything.
You should consider joining the discord channel where people are active almost daily. Request feedback, trade stories for feedback, discuss what to improve, etc. Many seem to have found it to be very helpful. -
@mononyan Hey there! I can't find the Discord invite... Could you please send it here?
-
@mononyan I don't have Discord though, and I'm sure many others don't either. Can I post my novel elsewhere for feedback?
I also don't see where the judges stated they won't give feedback. Last year, even if we failed, we could request to know why in the email we received confirming the fact. Not having that feedback in my opinion is detrimental, as without it, writers truly can't tell what was wrong. Sure, peer review can possibly point to why, but other times it can't, because sometimes peers could say everything looks good, but the judges say otherwise.
On a different note, I do feel there need to be better opportunities for writers outside Japan to get a chance at getting a publishing deal with Japanese companies. I'm pretty sure the main reason many join the contest is to eventually get their work adapted into manga, anime, and/or published in Japan, something publishing with a Western-based publisher often times can't guarantee. The contest practically ensures that there will only be a small handful that even get the chance, which in turn can lead to many good series missing out, not necessarily because they're bad, but because they simply lost out to novels the judges would rather see get adapted over them, or they just weren't said judges' cup of tea so to say.
-
@AuthorMN said in [JNC LIGHT NOVEL CONTEST 2025] Round 1 Judging for "Ongoing Series" Category Announced!:
I also don't see where the judges stated they won't give feedback. Last year, even if we failed, we could request to know why in the email we received confirming the fact. Not having that feedback in my opinion is detrimental, as without it, writers truly can't tell what was wrong. Sure, peer review can possibly point to why, but other times it can't, because sometimes peers could say everything looks good, but the judges say otherwise.
I agree that it's very much in J-Novel's best interest to provide a sentence or two summing up why the story was rejected. When I wrote asking for the reason last year, I was told the judge left nothing in my case. I wrote a brand new story based on the limited peer review feedback I received, and the new story was also rejected. What I need to know is why J-Novel thinks my work won't sell, and that's not something peer reviewers can necessarily identify. I essentially wasted my time writing something that was rejected yet again, when I could have written something that would've passed had I only known what was wrong with my entries.
-
@Alfaerin There were over 600 plus entries in the 2024 light novel contest and it sounds like there were as many, if not more entries this year.
Of those 600 plus entries, they selected only 32 so they would have to write 1,000 plus sentences on why they rejected various book ideas.
The reasons publishers have for rejecting a book are varied and different. For example, what is a solid reason for rejection at J-Novel could be vastly different at Seven Seas, Random House, or Simon and Schuster.
J-Novel is a business and if they have information showing that they make no profit on certain genres of stories they won't license it, no matter how good it is.
Ideally, a publisher should take every manuscript sent to them and evaluate it with a pass through their editors. Find weakness in writing, suggest ways of firming up the characters, help fix plot holes. But that is dedicating literally hundreds, no thousands of hours. For 30 manuscripts, that is hard, but doable. For 600 plus? It is impossible.
So it's up to the author to take their story and improve. Take writing classes, join writing groups, read and study other stories in the genre that they are writing.
The writing space is chocked full of authors trying to get their stories published. You have to stand out and keep writing, editing, and revising your stories. The publisher doesn't have the bandwidth to do it for you.
And you will be rejected. 30, 60, some times more than 100 times by different publishers before someone says "Yes."
-
@Alfaerin Don't say that you've wasted your time. Well, I get it, writing a story only to oneself is probably not worth all the hard work and effort. But now you have something that you've created, something special that is dear to you, isn't that right? I've already read the first page of your story and it appears to be very well written and promising. Give me some time to read the rest, I'll give you my thoughts then. But it's like AuthorMN said, maybe there's nothing really wrong about it, maybe all the other entries were just way too good, or more mainstream and the editors thought they can be more profitable with less risk, or just not the cup of tea of the judge. Who knows? One thing is certain, there is no formula to success.
-
@Alfaerin Exactly! Not to mention, things were pretty vague in regards to the guidelines for the ongoing series at times. The 10,000 word limit for both the outline and character descriptions was also a hindrance at times as there were quite a few people who had plans for lots of volumes, which naturally means you're not going to be able to fit everything there. As such, we also had less room for going into detail on some of the more complex things about the world we sought to build. I heard that the outlines were supposedly the big thing the judges were looking for.
Peers can't properly give you feedback on that, as they could think it looks good, but the judges don't like the direction. I believe one of the staff even said the outline was to be our "sales pitch" further enhancing the need for feedback as there's no way we can know what really cost our novels a spot in the finals without it.
And while I'm on the topic, it's also worth wondering if the judges checked out your ongoing series if it was posted and being uploaded, to see how well it lined up with the outline. I don't think this would happen, but anxiety can sometimes lead you to believe that's the case.
My ongoing entry is also an ongoing webnovel series, which is more often than not updated with new chapters daily. While my entry was an improved version of the first season of said story, I worry that with the current season I'm writing, the judges might have taken a peak at it and said, "Wait, this guy sounds like a major character! Why wasn't he in the outline!?" or "This story arc wasn't in the outline!" And in my defense to that, the reason they weren't is because I hadn't even thought of them until after the deadline for submitting the story had passed.
That's the other thing I didn't like about how vague the guidelines were. With long ongoing series, you don't always know everything that will happen, or who will become a major character or not. Things can change at the drop of a hat. It makes me wonder what some of the outlines were like for those that passed. Did they have clear visions for every story beat? A definitive ending? This is why feedback is necessary.
-
@morbelek It's not impossible; they gave such reasoning upon request last year. The avenues you've proposed for improvement only help if the work was failed for lack of quality. They cannot help a writer whose work was rejected for being deemed unprofitable. By letting contestants know why their works are being rejected, JNC judges will waste less time reading works that will never pass and writers will waste less time producing and submitting works that will never pass. If nothing else, it would be extremely helpful if JNC could at least release a list of the most common reasons why works were rejected.
Edit:
@shiratori-keira I normally write for the sake of writing, because I love my craft, but long story short, I am running out of time to make a writing gig work. Either I find a way to pay for my insulin or I will most likely die. -
@morbelek said in [JNC LIGHT NOVEL CONTEST 2025] Round 1 Judging for "Ongoing Series" Category Announced!:
@Alfaerin There were over 600 plus entries in the 2024 light novel contest and it sounds like there were as many, if not more entries this year.
Of those 600 plus entries, they selected only 32 so they would have to write 1,000 plus sentences on why they rejected various book ideas.
Last year, I believe all the judges wrote feedback on the entries they reviewed, and if not, it was stated that they didn't.
@morbelek said in [JNC LIGHT NOVEL CONTEST 2025] Round 1 Judging for "Ongoing Series" Category Announced!:
The reasons publishers have for rejecting a book are varied and different. For example, what is a solid reason for rejection at J-Novel could be vastly different at Seven Seas, Random House, or Simon and Schuster.
J-Novel is a business and if they have information showing that they make no profit on certain genres of stories they won't license it, no matter how good it is.
And that right there is the conundrum. Even if your novel is unique, thrilling, and well-written, it's uniqueness could also be it's undoing if it's not part of the "genre that sells". And I hate to be that guy, but to me that says that if your story isn't isekai/fantasy, it means you've got a much higher hill to climb compared to others. Looking at the finalists, it's clear isekai/fantasy is the prevalent genre. I'm glad there are some non-isekai/fantasy novels amongst them, but still, it's clear isekai/fantasy is the preferred genre. The thing I like about the JNC contest is that there's no theme/genre restrictions/requirements, nor are you required to create an entirely new story from scratch simply for the contest. This allows authors to submit stories that aren't confined to strict guidelines, allowing for more creative works. But if there is a preferred genre, then I feel either it needs to be stated that it's the case in future contests, or two separate contests, one specifically for stories of the isekai/fantasy genre and one for those that aren't, are held in order to give those other novels more of a chance at passing.
@morbelek said in [JNC LIGHT NOVEL CONTEST 2025] Round 1 Judging for "Ongoing Series" Category Announced!:
So it's up to the author to take their story and improve. Take writing classes, join writing groups, read and study other stories in the genre that they are writing.
The writing space is chocked full of authors trying to get their stories published. You have to stand out and keep writing, editing, and revising your stories. The publisher doesn't have the bandwidth to do it for you.
If the judges' main reason for rejecting a novel is not because it's bad, but solely because they don't think it will sell because it's not of the "most profitable genre" or lacks any metrics to show it can sell well, then no amount of writing support groups will solve that problem. In this case, your main issue will be showcasing to the judges that your work can in fact be profitable. But on that note, just how are you going to convince the publisher to take a chance with it? My only guess would possibly be popularity. This is why I believed that the judges would check out your ongoing works, in order to see how popular they are. But if they don't do that, then do we ourselves need to provide such metrics?
