@Thecardq said in Name swearing:
@Geezer-Weasalopes said in Name swearing:
This hasn't been discussed in-story, true, but has there been any circumstances where such discussion would be justified?
If remaking a name stone were something reasonably achievable, then I doubt Georgine would've accepted Mattias's excuse about not wanting his growth hindered by his stone.
On the other hand, even if it were a not-so-hard thing to do, to shift from one name-stone to another would seem to require a period where your name had been returned to you so that you could then offer up the snazier name-stone.
Given what all Georgine is up to, I suspect she would consider that an unacceptable security risk.
Once she has someone's name, she uses them for stuff that she really doesn't want reported to Aub Ehrenfest.
Releasing them for any amount of time carries the risk of their having decided they want out.
So better to hold off a bit if it looks like they'll still willingly give her their name in the end.
My impression hadn't been that his growth would be hindered, but rather that he hadn't gathered ingredients of a quality to allow her to take proper advantage of his mana's full potential; for that understanding to be correct does seem to indicate that the one who has received the name-stone can in some manner draw upon the mana of the giver, that more is involved than just having control of a sort over the individual, but also the ability to draw upon the mana associated with them. If the quality of the stone, or the abilities at the time it is made can limit what can be siphoned off, that's justification for holding off in some cases.