@kuali said in Safe & Sound Vol. 3 Discussion!:
In her defence, she left a child she'd essentially raised to the 'mercy' of an abusive family to have that life. Whether it was her choice or not, I certainly wouldn't blame her for feeling guilty about what Chloe went through after she left.
Yeah, but together with "must forever call you Milady even if you ask me not to do that" it was just too excessive. Feeling some guilt, yeah. Everybody would. Being sad about not being able to be there for Chloe, of course.
Ritually beating your head on a nearby surface for failing to care more about somebody else's child than your own family, that's Dobby-levels of caricature.
@kuali said in Safe & Sound Vol. 3 Discussion!:
I mean, would a name have made it better? She'd have still been a throwaway in Lloyd's 11th hour backstory even if the author had spent a sentence dubbing her Fridgie Mentora.
Fair point, if that was the only change. But, like, giving them a name is a step towards making them an actual character, who could be mentioned more than once, whose appearance in the memory could get some foreshadowing, a mention in the epilogue to show she's not forgotten, etc. The way the story does it is just so aggressively uninterested in who she actually was it really, really stands out.